Wednesday, October 19, 2011

Fox News: real winner of the GOP debate | Jeff Winkler

Disclosure

GOP debate was none of the candidates, but a brilliant performance of the network liberals love to hate

The Republican presidential debate in 2012 in Ames, Iowa, on Thursday night was exciting. Really.

course, was a public debate between conservative clothing enjoyable. And took place in west-central Midwest states most -. The insistence of the people of Iowa "in the maintenance of a plane normal to the middle class is almost fanatical However, about two hours of light, thanks to the co-host of the event Fox News if the bad news is good news for television ("This is the blood"), however, the good news about Fox's performance is sure to be bad news for all - including the organization of the media themselves

It starts with a grid of Fox and his conservative media co-host, the Washington Examiner, finally gave the seven candidates in the phase of something else to worry about your hair neatly combed. Sharp and insightful, issues not only forced the candidates to separate themselves from the pack, but also contributed to a critical evaluation of the candidates themselves conservative - focus on criticism.

Minnesota, Pawlenty and Bachmann was one after another, like two hockey veterans to fight for the last dental plan - ironic, since both hate Obama health law . The gloves came out after a message from Mike Wallace so much for being too "nice". Who won the match in a cage? Who cares. The shots each were valid criticisms to be used as input for future opponents.

This provocation has continued with the juicy questions - social issues. While the other pandered forgivingly or out of the plane jumped the shark social conservative, Rick Santorum stayed firm when pushed on abortion and gay marriage. It's a shame answers enthusiasts former Senator from Pennsylvania were outdated and downright scary. While taxes, limited government policies are the main target of most conservatives and the Tea Party these days, made it clear that Santorum is a fan of the tenth amendment, until it struck the Ten commandments.

For the rest of them, Mitt Romney was mainly Sentinel, modeling his broad shoulders and presidential elections. Ron Paul probably confused a lot of people to be pro-religion, anti-war, pro-gay, anti-abortion. Herman Cain and always wants a loyalty test for Muslims, but only for the most dangerous. There was another guy, too. Forgot his name.

direct questions with Fox, the Conservative candidate used to be pampered was nowhere to run. Standing before the cameras to transmit a signal broadcast nationally, Santorum complained that he had been "ignored". (Candidates Gary Johnson and Thad McCotter could not be reached for comment.) Meanwhile, Newt Gingrich complained of "gotcha" questions.

To be fair, "respected" journalists Bachmann NewsBeast fury ridiculously alarmist and Time magazine gave Fox their accessories. Immediately after the debate, the New York Times assistant managing reservoir praise unreservedly retweeted Liberal Think Progress.

Therefore, by most accounts, Fox did a great job as moderator. On the other hand, you really can not trust the MSM liberal bias.

But the headaches caused by the media a great return on Fox is twofold. For one thing, other news organizations have to step up their game, if a debate. CNN debate in New Hampshire in June only solved a question that everyone already knew the answer to: candidates do not like the current president. As for the cowardly and much derided by the hosting rights "respected" journalist John King - you know you've done something wrong policy still called the "roaring moderator." Fox showed journalists to other to get definitive answers can be done if you do the questions blank, but, you know, "respectfully." They want more political solutions to the economy bad? Go ahead, they grill. Fox showed him what to do.


See more about : [Time][NewsBeast][Russert][Williams][Brian][MSNBC][Romney][Mitt][Pawlenty][Washington]

0 comments:

Blog Archive