HMRC tax deal with Vodafone 'may have been illegal'
parliamentary committee examining allegations of tax exemption of $ 7 billion was out of HM Revenue and Customs powers
A controversial deal that cost tax billions of public money could have been illegal, according to reports reviewed by a powerful parliamentary committee.
The Public Accounts Committee is looking into allegations of an informant who said that an agreement to waive a tax bill of up to potential $ 7 billion of Vodafone may have been beyond the powers of HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC).
Furthermore, the complainant also stated that the agreement that those responsible for HMRC said the American company Goldman Sachs less than £ 10 million was actually worth 20 million pounds of taxpayers.
The committee wants a quality control commission to examine allegations of depth.
movement could cause more problems than Dave Hartnett, HMRC chief, who admitted mistakes, while the tax disputes high performance solution with multinational corporations.
He already faces a separate investigation of a judge who was commissioned by the National Audit Office to review the bids.
Margaret Hodge, who chairs the committee, said he had received new allegations of someone with detailed knowledge of the apparent bid and confirmed that lawyers can now be evaluated.
"The main argument is that the officials acted Revenue and Customs
ultra vires
[beyond his powers] and we have a obligation to take this seriously, "he said.
Hartnett has been accused of allowing Vodafone to give up a £ 6.75bn tax to solve a long-standing dispute with the company.
The dispute began 11 years ago when Vodafone acquired the German engineering company and mobile operator Mannesmann in one of the largest ever takeover agreements.
The agreement was established in July 2010, according to the knowledge they have included estimates of future profits of Vodafone for the years 2011 and 2012.
According to the filing of the complainant before the Commission, the estimated future benefits
ultra vires
. There is no implication that Vodafone has done nothing wrong.
The share of future payments that the agreement was made in a public accounts committee last month by Stephen Barclay, Conservative MP for North East Cambridgeshire, which is a member of the commission.
Any examination of an officer of HMRC asked. "[The agreement] seems odd in a number of levels in the first place, including the benefit of 2011 and 2012, but since the agreement was reached in 2010, I welcome your opinion on how they knew what that the benefit would be in 2012? "HMRC officials responded by saying he could not vouch for the privilege.
documents submitted to the Commission by the complainant and seen separately by the guardian argued that HMRC has no discretion to include estimates of future earnings.
Points of submission to the opinion "would be essential in the study of all the evidence before the committee and tell us where we can go after bringing information to Parliament.
0 comments:
Post a Comment