Public sector must not collude in cuts | Cath Elliott
Public sector workers should fight to defend services, and resist coalition calls for them to act like turkeys voting for Christmas
There's little doubt that the spending cutsannounced this week, 25% on most government agencies have a very detrimental impact on the UK 's public services: It' s obvious that such strong contractions can not be achieved without a direct impact on frontline services and the public sector 'ability to provide such services.
And yet, in a strange twist, the public sector workers are now asked to identify themselves where they think these cuts should come. It's almost as though, much like turkeys voting for Christmas, the government expects those whose jobs are on the line to suddenly turn around and offer themselves up to the axe-man voluntarily.
The letters that David Cameron and Nick Clegg have sent out "asking staff to help find 'fair and responsible' cuts" are, of course, nothing more than a cynical ploy to try and ensure that public sector workers bear some of the brunt when the whole charade goes tits up â" as it inevitably will. In a few years' time, when people start complaining about the loss of the welfare state, and about the fact that their local libraries, swimming pools and museums have closed down, Cleggeron will at least be able to say that they consulted with staff in the public sector, and that without the expert advice they took at the time the situation would invariably have been even worse.
Well, my message to public sector workers would be, don't do it. Do not collude with a government that is intent on destroying public services, and do not be fooled for one minute into thinking that if you can persuade them to focus cuts in an area far away from your own, they won't be coming for your department and your job next. Because trust me, they will.
Despite their protestations to the contrary, it was clear from the start that the coalition government had no intention of penalising the bankers for the state of the economy or, indeed, of ensuring that the cost of putting things right would be borne by those who could most afford to pay. This week's emergency budget has simply confirmed that the doom-mongers among us were right all along. So public sector workers are now to be punished for the profligacy of the private sector, and those who are most in need of support and services are going to end up being those least able to access them. Anyone who thought that the Lib Dems would prove to be a civilising influence on the Tories must now be wondering where on earth it all went so horribly wrong.
Of course, public sector employees to know exactly where the waste in their services, but they also know the futility of involving them as areas of concern. It 's not the front of the workers, in the end, those who earn massive bonuses at the taxpayers' expense, and nor is it frontline workers who get to determine which ridiculously expensive consultancy firms to commission to do "business process re-engineering" or whatever other management non-jobbery those at the top manufacture out of their blue-sky thinking. But frontline workers also know that they're always going to be the first ones in the firing line when the cuts start to bite, and that whatever happens, it certainly won't be the chief executives and their ilk who are made to feel the pinch.
As a taxpayer as well as someone who's worked in public services, I'm well aware of how my local taxes have been squandered over the years. Like many people, I don't begrudge a penny that I've contributed towards public sector pension schemes, and I'm more than happy to help pay for much needed local services like schools, refuse collection or care schemes for the elderly or infirm.
However, I feel sorry for every penny that 's been spent on PFI projects outrageous as the Norfolk and Norwich Hospital that saw venture capitalists fleecing local taxpayers here out of tens of millions of pounds, and I also begrudge the amount of our money that's been wasted on Norwich's bid to become a unitary authority: The rate of 2 million pounds plus on the line now to nothing . I also begrudge my local council losing millions in bad investments, and I begrudge every penny that has been spent on the outsourcing or market testing of any public service.
But I also know that these are the areas that Cameron and Clegg don't want to hear about. I know that these are not the type of cuts this government wants to make. So, rather than waste my time responding to the government's call for suggestions, I will instead be preparing to fight to defend our public services. And I'd urge everyone else to do the same.
- Public sector cuts
- Economic policy
- Public sector pay
- Budget
- Liberal-Conservative coalition
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(178)
-
▼
July
(32)
- Public sector must not collude in cuts | Cath Elliott
- Public sector must not collude in cuts | Cath Elliott
- Safety and security top agenda at African Union su...
- The Fiver: Over 500 Words About Nothing Happening ...
- Inside the Parole Board: how freedom is granted or...
- Inside the Parole Board
- Today in Sport - have your say on the day's issues
- How -50C freeze devastated nomads' way of life
- David Baddiel: from stand-up to Saul Bellow
- Facing the challenge of Kent
- Stranglehold
- 'Feminism is not finished'
- Is the British middle class an endangered species?
- Facing the challenge of Kent
- Reassessing Waitrose
- Summer reading: 'coalition books'
- Top 10 beaches in Turkey
- Women stick to traditional subjects
- My Barcelona top 10
- Politics live blog - Monday 12 July
- Stonewall rates gay-friendly universities
- Cutswatch: We're monitoring cuts
- We're keeping a watch on cutbacks across the UK
- Steve Webb plays pensions conjurer as spoptlight w...
- Without any fear for the future, boys have given u...
- 10:10 โ€“ progress on our pledges
- Du Plantier murder: village of Schull in West Cork...
- Ignore the anti-soya scaremongers
- The method in Maradona's madness
- England v Australia
- Is the Nike TV advert cursed?
- Andy Murray v Jo-Wilfried Tsonga โ€“ LIVE
-
▼
July
(32)
0 comments:
Post a Comment