Tuesday, January 22, 2013

What will the new Google search mean for teachers?

8:32 AM | Posted by Free Game Zone | Edit Post

plans that knowledge Chart Google and the search for new ones emerge

Ben Morse

explores the impact of these events on education and the people who work in schools

plans that knowledge Chart Google and the search for new ones emerge, Ben Morse explores the impact of these events on education and the people who work in schools

observer

In an interview this weekend, Tim Adams met Amit Singhal Google search of big fish. During the synthesis brief history of Google, and the goal is to draw new knowledge, a question came to me, that should be disturbing many of us - what it means for teachers

Currently, Google search works reflex - that is, it learns from you as you learn from it. The amount of time you spend on a page, if you click again and modify your search are listed in order to make your search more efficient and smooth. Not only that, but now associated free - was the example, typing "10 Downing Street" takes partner sites to do with the government and the Prime Minister, and address only. Quickly by typing "Michael Gove" bring not only their policies, but it is assumed that the Samaritans Helpline too. So it will really be a time saver. I digress. Whilst good news for education? Maybe. Mr. Singhal said that, in reality, "the most precise machine is used, the issues become lazy." And work as a teacher, to see how young people access Internet content, which may be sadly true.

  • But we will follow this line of thinking with logic - if the search becomes more nuanced Internet - if you can anticipate, to associate and to extrapolate meaning so that whatever ham Fist of the original question, response is obtained with little effort, what does this mean for education? My father told me when I was looking for a job, "people will always need education." Now that is in doubt. Far from being a profession of bullets, you want something something as simple as Google makes us obsolete?
  • do not think he will. But I'm still interested in the profession. Because what will happen is that the nature of educational change earthquake in the next 10 years. And now we have problems to adapt to adjustments in the curriculum. The nature of education has changed. Experts who have spent years to distill, refine and gather their knowledge, they put everything online, and it is there at the touch of a button, anyone with access to the reading. If, as Larry Page, Google co-founder (and apparently mad scientist) provides that the natural conclusion is that they all have chips inserted into the brain that can access the hive mind of the Internet, it is points science classes? Or some lessons for that matter? Glass containers with Google real-time contextual information and Google Now, the application gives you information based on where you are and search patterns already exist. It is a bleak picture, and you could be forgiven for updating your CV in despair.
not all bad news, however. Teaching simply adapt. How we work with children with brain training and how to learn, and what we do with the knowledge that access could and should be a priority more in education.

reminds me of a question that was asked Reddit: "If someone in the 1950s appeared today, it would be the hardest thing to explain life TODAY ' Today "The best response?" I own a device in your pocket, you can access all the information known to man. I used to see pictures of cats and compete with strangers. "


Knowledge is nothing without the tools to interpret. Critical thinking, decision-making skills with group learning and interpretation of knowledge is highly valued in the very near future. Meanwhile, we are talking about teaching to the test, and if we bring Latin or not. We found a shortcut to learning evolution. Education must adapt accordingly. So, why not?

Find best price for : --Guardian----Google--

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Blogger Template created with Artisteer.